Why were the Manchus so much more successful in ruling China after Essay

Why were the Manchus so much more successful in ruling China after their conquest of the Ming than their predecessors, the Mongols, were in ruling over China after the fall of the Song - Essay Example The Mongols, initially, sought to segregate themselves and maintain different cultural identities, but eventually integrated with the society and adopted many of the ways of the Chinese. By concerning itself with the maintenance of power as a conquering force, and subjugating the Chinese people under a heavy handed rule, the Manchu dynasty would be a longer, more successful rule than the Mongol dynasty. During the time of the Song dynasty in China, a great growth of the country would take place. As advances in science, the arts, and in philosophy would expand, so to did the population double in size. All of these things are signs of a thriving civilization. However, these advancements were diminished by a government that did not recognize the need for a global attitude. Expansion of the government itself did not occur in order to meet the demands of a greater population. As the country of China and its people thrived, the roots of the country, the core government, did not sustain enough strength to hold onto its nation. In an attempt to expand and promote new growth, Wang Anshi created what is known as the ‘New Laws’. â€Å"Wang not only tried to expand channels of revenue and the apparatus of local order, but explicitly argued that the state must enlarge itself and in effect absorb into an expanding bureaucracy the growing wealthy and educated elite.† (Embree, p. 348) According to Ainslee T. Embree and Carol Gluck, in their book, Asia in Western and World History, if Wang Anshi’s reforms had taken place they would have rivaled advancements made in industry and state building that did not occur again until the late 19th and early 20th century. However, after the fall of North China, Wang’s reform party would be defeated and the advanced concept of ‘growth of the state’ would end. A general lack of interest in forward motions of modernity would stagnate the growth of the country as the growth of the

Is the institutionalisation of social movements inevitably Essay

Is the institutionalisation of social movements inevitably emasculating - Essay Example These movements make demands through various means like lobbying, protesting and other campaigns. This is in contrast with the historic system of overthrows whereby people, mainly men, with dissatisfaction with a given regime, used various means to either overthrow the entire government or military cessations that led to a complete revolution and change in the nation. This paper examines whether the institutionalisation of social movements are emasculating or not. Hence, this research paper will examine the following research question: whether the institutionalisation of social movements is inevitably emasculating or not. To this end, the paper critiques various theories and concepts of social movements and its impact. The paper will draw on contemporary and historical examples in order to critique the topic in order to synthesise different concepts and theories to draw conclusions on the fundamental research question. In previous times, protest groups were seen to be an affront to the nation and to the authorities of the state (Marx, 1974). Therefore, the governments, police and authorities in these different nations and communities used informants to spy on these protest groups in order to get inside information about these protesters in order to make arrests (Marx, 1974) . Examples of these situations and phenomenon include totalitarian regimes like Tsarist Russia, the Soviet Union, North Korea and other nations. These countries used various approaches and means to gain information and feedback about protest groups. However, in the West today and in most parts of the world which are democratic, the attitudes and approaches to protests are different. Save for a few countries like Egypt and North Korea today, most countries are nations with freedom of speech and the right to free association. Nations like the United States and the United Kingdom have also come a long way. And the previous system of viewing